Final Comments

 

David M. Adams and William J. Winslade

 

The Journal of Clinical Ethics 22, no. 4 (Winters 2011): 358-62.

 

      We argued in our joint article [in the same issue of JCE] that the facilitated consensus model of clinical ethics consultation is incomplete because it does not address the problem of what we have called “unsettled cases.” Sabrina Derrington and April Dworetz, Mark Aulisio, and Al Jonsen have each usefully challenged our claims and conclusions. In this brief article we respond to some of their arguments.